Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawLatest NewsEmployment tribunalsUnfair dismissal

House of Lords votes against day-one dismissal rights

by Jo Faragher 18 Jul 2025
by Jo Faragher 18 Jul 2025 Employees could face a six-month qualifying period before they can claim for unfair dismissal
Shutterstock
Employees could face a six-month qualifying period before they can claim for unfair dismissal
Shutterstock

The House of Lords has voted for an amendment to the Employment Rights Bill that would replace day-one unfair dismissal rights with a six-month qualifying period.

The day-one right to make a claim for unfair dismissal was one of the key pledges in Labour’s pre-election manifesto published last year.

Early drafts of the legislation referred to an “initial period of employment” when employers could dismiss staff for a certain number of reasons, but this period was not specified.

The Lords have now voted to remove this initial period entirely, and have amended the Bill to reduce the qualifying period for unfair dismissal from the current two years to six months.

Unfair dismissal rights

Facilities firms share ‘deep concerns’ on workers’ rights 

Employment tribunal backlog up 23% in a year 

This would improve protection for workers by allowing them to make a claim much sooner, but also means that there would be no need to introduce a new legal structure to account for the qualification period.

It would also reduce the burden on the tribunal system, with employment lawyers concerned that there will be a rise in employment litigation as a consequence of the new legislation.

The Lords backed the amendment by 304 votes to 160. It was sponsored by Lord Hunt of Wirral and crossbench peer Lord Vaux of Harrowden.

The amendment could be rejected when the Bill goes back to the House of Commons. If this happens, ‘day-one’ rights could still go ahead with some complex conditions on the initial period of employment, which could be longer than six months.

Stephen Simpson, employment law and compliance expert at Brightmine, said the Lords vote was a “significant moment” for the Employment Rights Bill. Research by Brightmine has shown that more than three-quarters of HR professionals (76.3%) think day-one unfair dismissal rights will have a significant impact on their organisation.

Simpson said: “Under current rules, employers have more flexibility to manage underperforming staff within the first two years of service. If the changes go ahead, companies will still use probation periods but would need to demonstrate a fair process from the start.

“This increases pressure on HR teams to juggle multiple moving parts, particularly if line managers fail to follow the right process. The Lords’ rejection highlights the risks of introducing sweeping reforms within Labour’s first six months in office, without proper consultation with employers.

“HR teams are already under significant pressure, and the risk of a spike in tribunal claims is real if not handled with care.”

The changes to unfair dismissal regulations are timetabled to come into force in 2027, according to a roadmap published by the government at the start of July.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

 

Employee relations opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more Employee Relations jobs

Jo Faragher

Jo Faragher has been an employment and business journalist for 20 years. She regularly contributes to Personnel Today and writes features for a number of national business and membership magazines. Jo is also the author of 'Good Work, Great Technology', published in 2022 by Clink Street Publishing, charting the relationship between effective workplace technology and productive and happy employees. She won the Willis Towers Watson HR journalist of the year award in 2015 and has been highly commended twice.

previous post
Government launches call for evidence on unpaid internships
next post
Man who juggled four council jobs guilty of fraud

You may also like

Manager dismissed after covert recording with HR wins...

14 Jul 2025

£188k tribunal award for director sacked after cardiac...

10 Jul 2025

Man who used company credit card for himself...

23 Jun 2025

Date set for X’s appeal against unfair dismissal...

18 Jun 2025

WFH employee who falsified timesheets loses unfair dismissal...

16 Jun 2025

Sleeping security officer wins £20k for unfair dismissal

16 Jun 2025

Facilities firms share ‘deep concerns’ on workers’ rights

4 Jun 2025

Unfairly dismissed TUC workers awarded £100k

29 May 2025

Sighing in frustration at colleague was discriminatory, judge...

23 May 2025

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+